After
the smash hit 'Scream', Hollywood fat cats were bound to start
cashing in on teenage slash pics, and Urban Legend, from Sony
Pictures, was the third in line. As would be expected from
a carbon copy, the attempts at comic irony are lazy and the
characters have none of the charm nor innocence that Sarah
Michelle Gellar and Jennifer Love Hewitt had in 'I Know What
You Did Last Summer'.
Despite
several flaws however, it is a good effort by all means and
the finished product is polished and professional. An energetic
and stylish production ensure that the effective backdrops
to certain scenes and well worked out chase sequences keep
the viewer interested and occasionally in suspense. It is
no surprise then, that it smashed the box office and hit the
number one spot. It IS, no matter how many flaws it has, a
teenage crowd pleaser.

Buy
the Poster!
This
brings me onto the minus points, and trust me, there are a
lot of them. It's a wholly unbelievable movie. Who, on planet
earth, could believe that a seemingly fragile young gal could
survive being shot, falling from about five storeys, and almost
being drowned. If you can believe this, then you won't be
surrprised by some impossibly lucky execution scenes, notably
the hanging from a tree episode. Apart from this though, and
a below-par script, I can't really see any other problems
with this film. The idea of a killer stomping around a campus
basing his murders on urban legends is a good one and is well
executed - no pun intended, first-time director Jamie Blanks
has used a certain worksmanship style in this movie in which
everything falls into place and nothing is muddled - she falls
off the stairs, he dies in the car crash, they see the body
in the trunk. It is all so incredibly easy to understand,
so easy in fact, that a five year old could understand it,
which probably explains why this was such a hit with teens
across the U S of A.
I
liked this movie essentially because it was intended as carnage
candy and IS so, pure popcorn entertainment.
Simon
Savory
|