Saint
Clara, a 1996 film from Israel, is one of those works which
does so much in certain areas that it's more than a little
grim when it becomes clear the filmmakers didn`t have the
guts to go all the way with their premise. The film feels
somewhat unfinished, as if they did so much work in one place
they were too exhausted to finish the rest.
The
story has a strange premise. A 13-year old Russian immigrant,
Clara, has the power to predict the future, and to read people`s
thoughts. This sets up a catastrophic problem at her school,
when her entire class receives a perfect score on the recent
math test. The math teacher, with the help of the overbearing
principal, attempts over and over again to actually put on
a test without any cheating involved. And again and again,
it fails, even after a wonderfully creative plan in which
the teacher actually holds a lottery whereby the questions
are picked minutes before the test is to begin. Clara, naturally,
is able to tell all the students before the teacher`s arrival
what those questions will be.
At
the same time, a trio of hooligans who have nothing better
to do with their time than smash bottles against walls and
spy on people at night are in their own crisis because two
of the boys obviously have crushes on Clara. The crush is
so strong that it even comes to blows with a baseball bat.
And to top it off, we learn that if Clara ever falls in love,
she will lose her powers.
All
of this is great stuff. But after about the halfway point,
everything sort of petered out for me. The first half was
three-star material, as it mainly focussed on the school`s
concern about this possible conspiracy cooked up by the math
students. It was so quirky, I was just loving it. But after
a while, it disintegrated into the usual teeny-bopper stuff,
Hebrew style. Talk of "revolution" haunts the words of a number
of the students. As well, the principal speaks in these vague
terms to Clara, in the hopes his appearing to be sympathetic
to the youth`s concerns will make her stop this academic mockery.
At first, I wondered what this whole talk was about. Then
I dreaded it was the stupid teenage type of revolution, and
this film was aimed at the teenagers who think the mere mention
of the word from their peers' mouths actually meant they were
people on the side of right against the tyranny of the adult
world. And to prove it, let`s go around smashing bottles and
trying to set the school on fire!!!
I
think one of the biggest problems of the movie is Clara herself.
The actress gives a somewhat listless performance, at least
compared to the other actors on screen. The other characters
are right in saying she does have entrancing eyes, and she
does have a nice face, but she doesn`t have a really interesting
character. She is humourless, and out of touch with the real
world. But, then again, she isn`t really liked for her friendship
but for her supernatural abilities. So she is possibly being
exploited by her 'friends'. And she might be willing to help
the class cheat on the test, because it`s a way to fit in.
Don`t we all try out some kind of angle in order to make the
rest of the world accept us? While this theory is possible,
I`m still not as impressed by her as I am with others.
The
film`s delight remains in the purely academic situations,
as the principal and the teacher grow increasingly flabbergasted
at the challenge to their intellectual and supreme authority.
This ultimate exercise in cheating is seen as the ultimate
insult, and these professionals are in a battle to reclaim
their rights as superiors. When the teacher devises his ingenious
way to conduct the test, he is in a bliss which he compares
to his stint in Vietnam. This is fun stuff. And a few other
wacky scenes pointed the way to a strange, and good, satire
on the effects of such a unique person in society. But it
didn`t go all the way.
David
Macdonald
David
Macdonald's Movie Reviews
|