Cast
Hannibal Lecter (Anthony Hopkins)
Clarice Starling (Julianne Moore)
Paul Krendler (Ray Liotta)
Detective Pazzi (Giancarlo Giannini)
Mason Verger (Gary Oldman)
Directed by Ridley Scott Written by David Mamet and Steven
Zaillian, based on the novel by Thomas Harris
Rated R for strong gruesome violence, brief nudity and language
Running Time: 131 minutes Distributed by MGM/Universal

Buy
this Poster!
Hannibal
is an unlikable and limping gross-out sequel to the 1991 thriller
The Silence of the Lambs. The film opens with the hero of
the predecessor, FBI agent Clarice Starling (Moore), being
encountered in a swirl of controversy, for her recent violent
filled shootout with a dangerous criminal. Clarice is now
ten years older, still dedicated, but also confused about
the FBI and her superiors. On the other side of the world
in Florence, Italy is where the psychopath Dr. Hannibal Lecter
(Hopkins) is residing. Lecter is now free to hide under the
current name of Dr. Field, along with continuing cannibalistic
acts, while also collecting art and playing the piano. In
a matter of interest, a Florence detective named Pazzi (Giannini)
suspects Dr. Field of being Lecter. Pazzi decides to try and
catch him without the authorities, so he can sell Lecter to
rich man Mason Verger (Oldman). Verger is the only known surviving
victim of Dr. Lecter’s. He was a child molester that Lecter
treated and convinced to scar himself for life. Verger survived
with having crucial facial defamations and trouble with breathing.
Now, he yearns for revenge and he is willing to pay huge sums
for Lecter. Starling incredibly finds out of Lecter’s whereabouts
and Verger’s intentions, and now she has a mission to try
and rekindle Dr. Lecter to stop his unthinkable actions and
madness.
I
liked the first half of Hannibal, but the last hour of the
film drags its weight and finishes in a sick and what I found
weak climatic ending.
Two
screenwriters that I have an admirable respect for, David
Mamet and Steven Zaillian, adapted Hannibal from the book
by Thomas Harris. The film opens with a bang and the scenes
with Lecter in Italy are somewhat intriguing. However, I just
found the script to fall apart as the film progressed. I have
not read Harris’ novel, but I interviewed my brother, who
did read it, after I viewed this film. He explained to me
that some things were altered or left out of the script, with
the biggest concept change being the film’s ending. When he
told me what happened at the end of Harris’ novel, I saw it
as a cop-out and worse than the way the film ends. The characters
also tumbled into the messy script. Lecter was so terrifying
in the predecessor story and in this version it is as if he
is a comedian with his violent acts. Clarice, on the other
hand, has the same obsession, but is more or less aware and
isolated. Also, the script flow varies in each scene, in which
some of the interactions between the characters are quick
and precise, while others are slow. Overall, I believe the
most problems of the film are due to the script and even more
so to the overall choices by Harris in his novel.
Red-hot
off of Gladiator’s success, Ridley Scott stepped in the director’s
chair for Hannibal, after The Silence of the Lambs director
(Jonathan Demme) rejected to helm the picture. For the most
part, the direction is exquisite in Hannibal. There are many
sweet slow motion and action scenes that only Ridley Scott
could have photographed. Hannibal is also filled with the
beautiful and graceful setting of Italy for the first half
of the film. Scott’s outlook for this film is dark, but not
really as scary as it is gruesome. An example is the last
scene of the film, which is one of the most disgusting things
I have ever seen. It was as if Scott was directing a scene
from Faces of Death rather than a blockbuster film. Even though,
I didn’t like this film, Ridley Scott is still a very talented
and great director.
Anthony
Hopkins steps back into the role of Dr. Hannibal Lecter, which
previously won him an Oscar. Though Hopkins does a good job
in the film, this time around I didn’t find him chilling or
as mind-blowing as in The Silence of the Lambs. I remember
when I first few times I saw The Silence of the Lambs, I was
scared to walk down my grandmother’s long hallway to go to
bed. I thought that Dr. Lecter would be around the corner
waiting for me. Back then I was young, but I still find Hopkins
in The Silence of the Lambs as very scary. Hopkins resurfaces
Lecter’s voice and mannerisms, but it seemed that he lost
parts of the character, which I blame more on the script than
Hopkins. Julianne Moore steps into the character of Clarice
Starling after Jodie Foster refuse to reprise the role. Moore,
like Hopkins, is really good in the film, but she also shows
moments of the character being downsized. She does hold her
country accent and steals some scenes with her eyes and sternness.
An unrecognizable Gary Oldman turns in another sick and twisted
performance as the obsessed surviving victim of Lecter. Ray
Liotta returns to the screen and turns in a stable performance
as Clarice’s ex-lover and now boss, Paul Krendler. Finally,
Giancarlo Giannini turns in a terrific performance as the
Florence inspector Pazzi. Giannini has great puppy dog eyes
and sensible body language that contributes to his effective
performance. In fact, I found the most tension filled scenes
of the film to be riding on the shoulders of Giannini.
On
a side note, Hans Zimmer delivers a beautiful score full of
opera, enchantment and also creepy music that is one of the
best elements in this film.
Hannibal
is a film I am not recommending; I found it flat after the
first hour. This movie is also very graphic and gruesome,
so no one under seventeen years old should see this film.
In fact, I believe that Hannibal should have been rated NC-17
for its content.
Report
Card Grade: C-
Beastman’s
Movie Reviews
Copyright, 2001 Joseph C. Tucker
|