|  
                   Starring: 
                    Keanu Reeves, Vincent D'Onofrio, Cameron Diaz, Delroy Lindo 
                    Directed by: Steven Baigelman Written by: Steven Baigelman 
                    Rated PG-13 Running Time: 1 hour, 35 minutes  
                  "Feeling 
                    Minnesota" is a film that had really good intentions, but 
                    for me, fell short on it's execution. I'm still not entirely 
                    sure why. It stars Keanu Reeves as Jjaks, a drifter who has 
                    come home to Minnesota for his brother's wedding. His brother 
                    is named Sam, and is played by Vincent D'Onofrio as the kind 
                    of big brother who spent so many years beating up his younger 
                    brother that he doesn't know any other way to relate to him, 
                    except to be angry and hurtful. Of course, his whole wedding 
                    isn't exactly overflowing with joy, either. His soon-to-be-wife, 
                    Freddie (Cameron Diaz) is incredibly beautiful, but not at 
                    all in love with him. She's a "gift" to him by a drug dealer 
                    named Red (Delroy Lindo), after Sam discovered some money 
                    that was stolen from his drug-dealing boss. At the wedding, 
                    Freddie spots Jjaks, strikes up a conversation, and ends up 
                    having sex with him inside the house, while the "cheerful" 
                    wedding reception continues a few feet away. Freddie is not 
                    at all happy with the situation she finds herself in, and 
                    begs Jjaks to take her away with him. Naturally, this doesn't 
                    sit well with Sam, and he will take whatever actions necessary 
                    to get her back.  
                  I 
                    think "Feeling Minnesota" wants to be a cross somewhere between 
                    "Pulp Fiction" and "Fargo". It has that kind of a feel to 
                    it, but it lacks the energy that filled those movies. I think 
                    one of the differences is that in those films, the characters' 
                    actions were dictated by their personality quirks. There wasn't 
                    much self-awareness there. They inhabited their surroundings, 
                    without really "inhabiting" their surroundings. Take the characters 
                    of Jules and Vincent in "Pulp Fiction", for example. They 
                    did mean things, but never saw themselves as mean people. 
                    On the way to a contract hit, they discuss things like what 
                    a Quarter Pounder is called in France and the morals of giving 
                    a foot massage to their boss' wife. When Vincent's pistol 
                    goes off and blows the head off of the passenger in the back 
                    seat, he pleads that it was an accident, then blames Jules 
                    for driving over a bump in the road. What made "Pulp Fiction" 
                    fun was that it was told solely from the perspective of the 
                    characters involved. Imagine how depressing it would have 
                    been if it had taken it's subject matter seriously. I believe 
                    writer/director Steven Baigelman was going for the same thing, 
                    but "Feeling Minnesota" is different in that the characters 
                    act out of hatred toward each other rather than because of 
                    their quirks. I'm not saying the characters have to be redeeming, 
                    but they should be interesting. It's the hatred they feel 
                    toward each other that acts as a burden and wears the film 
                    down.  
                  Still, 
                    the movie does have some very funny moments, including a hilarious 
                    scene where Sam tries to open a safe. Baigelman throws in 
                    some good lines and a couple good sight gags, but it doesn't 
                    fully deliver on the promise it shows early on. The pieces 
                    are all there, right where they need to be - it just doesn't 
                    seem to come alive.  
                  Copyright 
                    2001 Michael Brendan McLarney Critically 
                    Ill 
 |