Woody
Allen proved himself to be a filmmaker of the highest caliber
in his 1989 film Crimes and Misdemeanours . The film stars
Allen, Martin Landau, Angelica Huston, Alan Alda, Mia Farrow,
and Law and Order`s Sam Waterson and Jerry Orbach.
Two
different storylines are contained within. The first deals
with eye-doctor Martin Landau`s extramarital affair with a
woman played by Huston. For a few years, this relationship
seems a happy one. In fact, Landau seems to be telling her
that someday they will truly be together, without the presence
of his wife. But, eventually, Landau gets bored. And Huston
is becoming increasingly angry with this, to the point of
wanting to tell Landau`s wife what sort of a man he really
is. I can`t say I really blame her, for she is pointing out
the inherent selfishness in how Landau is treating her. Landau
does not see it her way, however. And so he turns to two people
for advice. First, he speaks to one of his patients, his rabbi
(Waterson), who is slowly going blind. The rabbi believes
that Landau should simply come clean to his wife. Landau can`t
go through with it, believing it will ruin everyone and everything
around him. Soon the conversation turns to more elevated concerns,
as the rabbi and Landau debate morality, and the presence
of God. The rabbi insists that with God comes hope, if we
do our best to live a good, and moral life, and to ask forgiveness.
Landau, on the other hand, clearly cannot deal with the concerns
of the afterlife when his present concerns seem so much greater.
Which is why he turns to the second person for advice, his
brother (Orbach), who has ties to the mob. His brother says
with one phone call, the troubles would be over, and nobody
would ever know.
The
second storyline concerns Woody Allen`s antics as a documentary
filmmaker forced to make a film for an anthology series about
his incredibly arrogant brother-in-law, a famous sitcom producer
(Alda). In the process, Allen attempts his own extramarital
affair, with the anthology`s producer, played by Farrow. Allen
is a moral perfectionist who believes he has to dissuade people
from making choices he feels are wrong, and he exhibits this
with Farrow, who Alda is also pursuing. Allen cannot stand
to see these two together in any context. Allen sees Alda
as a creep, considering him a threat to Farrow`s own well-being.
However, he soon pays a heavy price for his moral righteousness.
The
most jarring aspect of this production is in its structure.
Parallel stories are nothing new, but the two stories here
seem, on the surface, to come from two different movies. The
Woody Allen sequences are, to a degree, what we would expect,
with Woody`s one-liners and the support of typical Allen cast
members as Mia Farrow and Alan Alda. But you are then unsettled
by the Martin Landau sequences, which are suitably bleak with
its subject matter. These are the sort of dramatics one would
expect from a film by Ingmar Bergman or Carl Dreyer, where
questions of morality and religion are dealt with in a brutally
frank matter. This is one of the few American films where
the subjects of morality and the existence of God is not window-dressing,
but crucial to the storyline.
Yet,
the film does tie these plots together at the end, and reveals
a complete and chilling statement which answers these questions.
It is not a happy answer, and it is Landau who discovers it
in a powerful and chilling performance. His bland doctor exterior
is unmasked to reveal a selfish, insecure, and cold man, who
will eventually discover a very good justification for wanting
to doubt the presence of God. Overall, this is a unique, unusual,
and important film from someone whom we are familiar with
as a funnyman, but who during his career has also proven himself
to be one of the great American directors.
David
Macdonald
David
Macdonald's Movie Reviews
|